Research Papers

Economic Potential of Innovative Receiver Concepts With Different Solar Field Configurations for Supercritical Steam Cycles

[+] Author and Article Information
Csaba Singer

Institute of Solar Research,
German Aerospace Centre (DLR),
Pfaffenwaldring 38-40,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: csaba.singer@dlr.de

Reiner Buck

Institute of Solar Research,
German Aerospace Centre (DLR),
Pfaffenwaldring 38-40,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: reiner.buck@dlr.de

Robert Pitz-Paal

Institute of Solar Research,
German Aerospace Centre (DLR),
Pfaffenwaldring 38-40,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
e-mail: robert.pitz-paal@dlr.de

Hans Müller-Steinhagen

TU Dresden,
Helmholtzstraße 10,
Dresden 01069, Germany
e-mail: rektor@tu-dresden.de

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. Manuscript received January 9, 2012; final manuscript received April 17, 2013; published online September 16, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Manuel Romero Alvarez.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 136(2), 021009 (Sep 16, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4024740 History: Received January 09, 2012; Revised April 17, 2013

The cost reduction potential of solar power towers (SPT) is an important issue concerning its market introduction. Raising the steam process temperature and pressure can lead to a cost reduction due to increased overall plant efficiency. Thus, for new receiver configurations, a supercritical steam cycle operated at 300 bar/600 °C/610 °C live steam conditions was assumed. The considered systems include innovative direct absorption receivers, either with conventional or beam down heliostat field layouts. For the beam down option, the receiver is assumed to be a cylindrical vessel with a flow-through porous absorber structure at the internal lateral area of the cylinder. The direct absorption receiver option consists of a cylindrical barrel with downwards oriented aperture, whose absorber structure at the internal lateral area is cooled by a molten salt film. For the assessment, CFD based methods are developed and able to examine the receiver efficiency characteristics. Based on the receiver thermal efficiency characteristics and the solar field characteristics, the annual performance is evaluated using hourly time series. The assessment methodology is based on the European Concentrated Solar Thermal Roadmap (ECOSTAR) study and enables the prediction of the annual performance and the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Applying appropriate cost assumptions from literature, the LCOE are estimated for each considered SPT concept and compared to tubular receiver concepts with molten salt and liquid metal cooling. The power level of the compared concepts and the reference case is 200 MWel. The sensitivity of the specific cost assumptions is analyzed. No detailed evaluation is done for the thermal storage, but comparable storage utilization and costs are assumed for all cases. At optimized plant parameters, the results indicate a LCOE reduction potential of up to 0.5% for beam down and of up to 7.2% for the direct absorption receiver compared to today's state of the art molten salt solar tower technology.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lata, J. M., 2008, “High Flux Central Receivers of Molten Salts for the New Generation of Commercial Stand-Alone Solar Power Plants,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.130(2), p. 021002. [CrossRef]
Pacheco, J. E., Bradshaw, R. W., Dawson, D. B., De la Rosa, W., Gilbert, R., Goods, S. H., Hale, M. J., Jacobs, P., Jones, S. A., Kolb, G. J., Prairie, M. R., Reilly, H.E., Showalter, S. K., and Vant-Hull, L. L., 2002, “Final Test and Evaluation Results From the Solar Two Project,” Sandia Technical Report No. SAND2002-0120.26,
Reilly, H. E., and Kolb, G. J., 2001, “An Evaluation of Molten-Salt Power Towers Including the Results of the Solar Two Project,” Sandia Technical Report No. SAND2001-3674.
Zavoico, A. B., 2001, “Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document,” Sandia Technical Report No. SAND2001-2100.
Denk, T., 1999, “Weiterentwicklung des optischen Designs von Sekundärkonzentratoren,” DLR Report, DLR, Koln, Germany.
Epstein, A., Segal, A., and Yogev, A., 1999, “A Molten Salt System With a Ground Base-Integrated Solar Receiver Storage Tank,” J. Phys. IV France, 09(PR3), pp. 95–104. [CrossRef]
RablA., 1985, Active Solar Collectors and Their Applications, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Schmitz, M., 2006, “Systematischer Vergleich von solarthermischen Turmreflektor- und Turmreceiversystemen,” Ph.D. thesis, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Segal, A., and Epstein, M., 2000, “The Optics of the Solar Tower Reflector,” Sol. Energy69(6), pp. 229–241. [CrossRef]
Hasuike, H., Yoshizawa, Y., Suzuki, A., and Tamaura, Y., 2006, “Study on Design of Molten Salt Solar Receivers for Beam-Down Solar Concentrators,” Sol. Energy, 80(10), pp. 1255–1262. [CrossRef]
Chavez, J. M., Tyner, C. E., and Couch, W. A., 1988, “Direct Absorption Receiver Flow Testing and Evaluation,” Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM.
Green, H. J., Bohn, M. S., and Carasso, M., 1988, “Hydrodynamic, Thermal, and Radiative Transfer Behavior of Molten Salt Films as Applied to the Direct Absorption Receiver Concept,” Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.
Newell, T. A., Wang, K. Y., and Copeland, R. J., 1986, “Falling Film Flow Characteristics of the Direct Absorption Receiver,” Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.
Wu, S. F., and Narayanan, T. V., 1988, “Commercial Direct Absorption Receiver Design Studies—Final Report,” Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND-88-7038.
Pitz-Paal, R., Dersch, J., and Milow, B., 2005, “European Concentrated Solar Thermal Road-Mapping,” DLR, Cologne, Germany, Paper No. SES6-CT-2003-502578.
Sargent and Lundy, LLC, 2008, “Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts,” Paper No. SL-009682, final draft report to Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
Singer, Cs., Buck, R., Pitz-Paal, R., and Müller-Steinhagen, H., 2010, “Assessment of Solar Power Tower Driven Ultrasupercritical Steam Cycles Applying Tubular Central Receivers With Varied Heat Transfer Media,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.132(4), p. 041010. [CrossRef]
Tamaura, Y., Yoshizawa, M., Utamura, H., Hasuike, H., and Ishihara, T., 2005, “Sunlight Heat Collector, Sunlight Collecting Reflection Device, Sunlight Collecting System, and Sunlight Energy Utilizing System,” European Patent Application No. EP1793181A1.
Hasuike, H., Yuasa, M., Wada, H., Ezawa, K., Oku, K., Kawaguchi, T., Mori, N., Hamakawa, W., Kaneko, H. and Tamauta, Y., 2009, “Demonstration of Tokyo Tech Beam-Down Solar Concentration Power System in 100 kW Pilot Plant,” SolarPACES 2009, Berlin, September 15–18.
Shaw, D., Bruckner, A. P., and Hertzberg, A., 1980, “A New Method of Efficient Heat Transfer and Storage at Very High Temperatures,” 15th lECEC, Seattle, WA, August 18–22.
Copeland, R. J., Leach, J. W., and Stern, G., 1982, “High Temperature Molten Salt Solar Thermal Systems,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC'82), Los Angeles, CA, August 8–12, Vol. 4, pp. 2032–2036.
Kiera, M., 1986, “Description of the Computing Code System HFLCAL,” Interatom Report No. GAST-IAS-BT-200000-075.
Buck, R., 2011, “Solar Power Raytracing Tool SPRAY,” User Manual-Version 2.6, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Leary, P. L., and Hankins, J. D., 1979, “User's Guide for MIRVAL: A Computer Code for Comparing Designs of Reliostat-Receiver Optics for Central Receiver Solar Power Plants,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Technical Report No. SAND77-8280.
Osuna, R., Fernandez-Quero, V., and Sanchez, M., 2008, “Plataforma Solar Sanlucar la Mayor: The Largest European Solar Power Site,” SolarPACES 2008, Las Vegas, NV, March 4–7.
León, J., Sánchez, M., and Pacheco, J. E., 1999, “Internal Film Receiver Possibilities for the Third Generation of Central Receiver Technology,” J. de Phys. IV France, 09(PR3), pp. 525–530.
Ansys Inc., 2010, ANSYS CFX, CFX-5 Solver Models and Theory User Manuals, Ansys, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Gruen, D. M., 1965, “Fused Salt Spectrophotometry,” Chemistry Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
Petrasch, J., Meier, F., Friess, H., and Steinfeld, A., 2008, “Tomography Based Determination of Permeability, Dupuit–Forchheimer Coefficient, and Interfacial Heat Transfer Coefficient in Reticulate Porous Ceramics,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(1), pp. 315–326. [CrossRef]
Buck, R., 2000, Massenstrom-Instabilitäten bei volumetrischen Receiver-Reaktoren, Fortschrittsberichte VDI, Reihe 3, Nr. 648, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Churchill, S. W., 1982, A Correlating Equation for Almost Everything, Etaner Press, Glen Mills, PA.
Drotning, W. D., 1977, “Solar Absorption Properties of a High Temperature Direct-Absorbing Heat Transfer Fluid,” 7th Symposium on Thermophysical Properties, Gaithersburg, MD, May 10–12, Report No. SAND-76-9104C; ERA-02-054114.
Hirt, C. W., and Nichols, B. D., 1981, “Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys.39(1), pp. 201–225. [CrossRef]
Taumoefolau, T., Hughes, G., Lovegrove, K. and Paitoonsurikarn, S., 2004, “Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Loss From a Model Solar Concentrator Cavity Receiver,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.126, pp. 801–807. [CrossRef]
Takahama, H., and Kato, S., 1980, “Longitudinal Flow Characteristics of Vertically Falling Liquid Films Without Concurrent Gas Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 6(3), pp. 203–211. [CrossRef]
Paitoonsurikarn, S., and Lovegrove, K., 2006, “A New Correlation for Predicting the Free Convection Loss From Solar Dish Concentrating Receivers,” Solar 2006: 44th ANZSES Annual Conference: Clean Energy? Can Do!, Canberra, Australia, September 13–15.
Pacheco, J. E., Showalter, S. K., and Kolb, W. J., 2002, “Development of a Molten-Salt Thermocline Thermal Storage System for Parabolic Trough Plants,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.124(2), pp. 153–159. [CrossRef]
Bradshaw, R. W., and Goods, S. H., 2002, “Accelerated Corrosion Testing of a Nickel-Base Alloy in a Molten Salt,” Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2001-8758.
Forsberg, C. W., 2007, “High-Temperature Liquid-Fluoride-Salt Closed-Brayton-Cycle Solar Power Towers,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129(2), pp. 141–146. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic layout of the BD receiver model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic layout of the DAR receiver model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Film thickness adjustment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between the two flux method and the combined methods used in this work

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Characteristics of the receiver concepts obtained from the analyzed used receiver models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Potential of LCOE reduction for the considered innovative receiver concepts in comparison to the reference design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Cost assumption sensitivity on the LCOE




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In