0
Research Papers

Drag Reduction Using Riblet Film Applied to Airfoils for Wind Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Agrim Sareen

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: sareen2@illinois.edu

Robert W. Deters

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: rdeters@illinois.edu

Steven P. Henry

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: henry12@illinois.edu

Michael S. Selig

Associate Professor
e-mail: m-selig@illinois.edu
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, IL 61801

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 7, 2011; final manuscript received June 16, 2013; published online September 16, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Christian Masson.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 136(2), 021007 (Sep 16, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: SOL-11-1247; doi: 10.1115/1.4024982 History: Received November 07, 2011; Revised June 16, 2013

This paper presents results of a study that was commissioned by the 3M Renewable Energy Division to measure the drag reduction by using riblet film on airfoils specifically designed for wind turbine applications. The DU 96-W-180 airfoil was tested with four different symmetrical V-shaped riblet sizes (44, 62, 100, and 150-μm) at three Reynolds numbers (1 × 106, 1.5 × 106, and 1.85 × 106) and at angles of attack spanning the low drag range of the airfoil. Tests were run with riblet film covering different sections of the airfoil in order to determine the optimal riblet location in terms of drag reduction. Results showed that the magnitude of drag reduction depended on the angle of attack, Reynolds number, riblet size, and riblet location. For some configurations, riblets produced significant drag reduction of up to 5%, while for others riblets were detrimental. Trends in the results indicated an optimum riblet size of 62-μm for the range of Reynolds numbers at which tests were conducted. The airfoil chord was 18 in (0.457 m). Results also showed that each riblet size performed best at a given Reynolds number with the optimal Reynolds number decreasing with an increase in riblet size.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Anonymous, 2005, “Robert L. Ash,” Quest, 8(2), p. 16. Available at http://www.odu.edu/ao/instadv/quest/Ash.html
Walsh, M. J., 1980, “Groves Reduce Aircraft Drag,” Technical Brief No. LAE-12599, NASA Langley Research Center.
Walsh, M. J., 1982, “Turbulent Boundary Layer Drag Reduction Using Riblets,” AIAA Paper No. 82–0169.
Walsh, M. J., and Lindemann, A. M., 1984, “Optimization and Application of Riblets for Turbulent Drag Reduction,” AIAA Paper No. 84-0347. [CrossRef]
Walsh, M. J., 1990, “Riblets,” Viscous Drag Reduction in Bounday Layers, ( AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol. 123), D. M. Bushnell and J. N. Hefner, eds., AIAA, Washington, DC, pp. 203–261.
Bechert, D. W., Hoppe, G., and Reiff, W. E., 1985, “On the Drag Reduction of the Shark Skin,” AIAA Paper No. 85-0546. [CrossRef]
Savill, A. M., 2001, “Riblet Geometries and Wind Turbine Applications and Airbus A330/340 Type Aircraft,” Technical Report, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Caram, J. M., and Ahmed, A., 1991, “Effect of Riblets on Turbulence in the Wake of an Airfoil,” AIAA J., 29(11), pp. 1769–1770. [CrossRef]
Caram, J. M., and Ahmed, A., 1992, “Development of the Wake of an Airfoil With Riblets,” AIAA J., 30(12), pp. 2817–2818. [CrossRef]
Han, M., Lim, H. C., Jang, Y.-G., Lee, S. S., and Lee, S. J., 2003, “Fabrication of a Micro-Riblet Film and Drag Reduction Effects on Curved Objects,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Vol. 1, pp. 396–399.
Sundaram, S., Viswanath, P. R., and Rudrakumar, S., 1996, “Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets on NACA 0012 Airfoil to Moderate Incidence,” AIAA J., 34(4), pp. 676–682. [CrossRef]
Raju, C., and Viswanath, P. R., 1998, “Base Drag Reduction Caused by Riblets on a GAW(2) Airfoil,” J. Aircraft, 35(6), pp. 988–991. [CrossRef]
Subaschandar, N., Kumar, R., and Sundaram, S., 1999, “Drag Reduction Due to Riblets on a GAW(2) Airfoil,” J. Aircraft, 36(5), pp. 890–892. [CrossRef]
Viswanath, P. R., 1999, “Riblets on Airfoil and Wings: A Review,” AIAA Paper No. 99-3402. [CrossRef]
Viswanath, P. R., and Mukund, R., 1995, “Turbulent Drag Reduction Using Riblets on a Supercritical Airfoil at Transonic Speeds,” AIAA J., 33(5), pp. 945–947. [CrossRef]
Wetzel, K. K., and Farokhi, S., 1996, “Interaction of Riblets and Vortex Generators on an Airfoil,” AIAA Paper No. 96-2428. [CrossRef]
Khodadoust, A., 1993, “An Experimental Study of the Flowfield on a Semispan Rectangular Wing With a Simulated Glaze Ice Accretion,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Jasinski, W. J., Noe, S. C., Selig, M. S., and Bragg, M. B., 1998, “Wind Turbine Performance Under Icing Conditions,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 120, pp. 60–65. [CrossRef]
Walsh, M. J., 1983, “Riblets as a Viscous Drag Reduction Technique,” AIAA J., 21(4), pp. 485–486. [CrossRef]
Drela, M., 1989, “XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils,” Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics (Lecture Notes in Engineering, Vol. 54), T. J.Mueller, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–12.
Timmer, W. A., and van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., 2003, “Summary of the Delft University Wind Turbine Dedicated Airfoils,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 125, pp. 488–496. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the UIUC low-turbulence subsonic wind tunnel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Riblet film viewed under a scanning electron microscope: a) 44-μm riblet film, and b) 62-μm riblet film (courtesy of 3 M)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cp distribution for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 as predicted by XFOIL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 as predicted by XFOIL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flow visualization on the upper surface of the DU 96-W-180 airfoil at α = 6 deg and Re = 1,500,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Laminar separation, reattachment and riblet film locations on the DU 96-W-180 airfoil at angles of attack near maximum L/D (symbols correspond to x/c locations and not airfoil surface normal)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Drag polars for the clean DU 96-W-180 at the three Re

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,000,000 with 44-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,000,000 with 62-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,000,000 with 100-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,000,000 with 150-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 with 44-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 with 62-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 with 100-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 with 150-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,850,000 with 44-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,850,000 with 62-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,850,000 with 100-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Drag polar for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,850,000 with 150-μm riblets in the turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Percent drag reduction variation with riblet size for the DU 96-W-180 at Re = 1,500,000 and riblets in the upper and lower surface turbulent regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Percent drag reduction variation with riblet size for the DU 96-W-180 at Cl = 0.75 and riblets in the upper and lower surface turbulent regions

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In