0
Research Papers

Intercomparison of Temperature Sensors for Outdoor Monitoring of Photovoltaic Modules

[+] Author and Article Information
Marko Jankovec

e-mail: marko.jankovec@fe.uni-lj.si

Marko Topič

University of Ljubljana,
Faculty of Electrical Engineering,
Tržaška cesta 25,
SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received July 16, 2012; final manuscript received January 7, 2013; published online April 29, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Santiago Silvestre.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 135(3), 031012 (Apr 29, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1178; doi: 10.1115/1.4023518 History: Received July 16, 2012; Revised January 07, 2013

Solar cells' temperature is a very important parameter that affects performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules since main electrical parameters of PV cells and modules are temperature dependent regardless the technology. The present study evaluates and compares different sensor types and mountings for long term outdoor temperature monitoring of PV modules along with a standardized method for determination of cell's temperature from open-circuit voltage. For that purpose, a special multicrystalline silicon PV module with miniature in situ Pt1000 temperature sensors was used for reference temperature measurement. On the back side of the PV module different temperature sensors were attached, including thermocouple (TC), platinum Pt1000 (PT) and digital temperature sensors DS18B20 (DS). All sensors except one were covered by a 1 cm thick insulation block. The whole setup was mounted on the outdoor PV testing site and all temperatures were monitored for several days with selection of different environmental conditions. On the basis of measurement results, deviations of different temperature sensors are investigated and compared to temperature calculated from open-circuit voltage measurement according to standard EN 60904-5. Among sensors attached at the back side, covered PT and TC sensors deliver the best results in range of 1–2 °C of lower temperature in average; while the covered DS sensor gives additional 1–2 °C underestimated temperature values. The worst measurement results demonstrate the PT sensor without insulation. All temperature sensors exhibit similar and adequate time response regarding the thermal capacitance of the PV module. DS sensors, although showing somewhat worse results, offer great advantages if several temperatures have to be acquired simultaneously and require very simple data acquisition equipment. They feature comparable measurement accuracy than commonly used Pt1000 temperature sensors if they are covered by insulation with 10 mm thick walls in lateral direction to avoid micro-environmental changes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

King, D. L., Kratochvil, J. A., and Boyson, W. E., 1997, “Temperature Coefficients for PV Modules and Arrays: Measurement Methods. Difficulties and Results,” Proceedings of 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference, Anaheim, September 29–October 3, pp. 1183–1186. [CrossRef]
Skoplaki, E., and Palyvos, J. A., 2009, “On the Temperature Dependence of Photovoltaic Module Electrical Performance: A Review of Efficiency/Power Correlations,” Sol. Energy, 83, pp. 614–624. [CrossRef]
Bliss, M., Betts, T. R., and Gottschalg, R., 2010, “Indoor Measurement of Photovoltaic Device Characteristics at Varying Irradiance, Temperature and Spectrum for Energy Rating,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 21(11), pp. 115701–115712. [CrossRef]
Fanney, A. H., Davis, M. W., Dougherty, B. P., King, D. L., Boyson, W. E., and Kratochvil, J. A., 2006, “Comparison of Photovoltaic Module Performance Measurements,” ASME J. Sol. Energy, 128, pp. 152–159. [CrossRef]
King, D. L., 1996, “Photovoltaic Module and Array Performance Characterization Methods for All System Operating Conditions,” NREL/SNL Program Review, ATP Press, pp. 347–368.
IEC, International Standard 60904-5:1993, Photovoltaic Devices—Part 5: Determination of the Equivalent Cell Temperature (ECT) of Photovoltaic (PV) Devices by the Open-Circuit Voltage Method, 1st ed., IEC, Geneva.
Huang, B. J., Yang, P. E., Lin, Y. P., Lin, B. Y., Chen, J. J., Lai, R. C., and Cheng, J. S., 2011, “Solar Cell Junction Temperature Measurement of PV Module,” Sol. Energy, 85, pp. 388–392. [CrossRef]
IEC International Standard 60891:2009, Procedures for Temperature and Irradiance Corrections to Measured I–V Characteristics of Photovoltaic Devices, 2nd ed., IEC, Geneva.
Breteque, E. A., 2009, “Thermal Aspects of c-Si Photovoltaic Module Energy Rating,” Sol. Energy, 83, pp. 1425–1433. [CrossRef]
Mattei, M., Notton, G., Cristofari, C., Musselli, M., and Poggi, P., 2006, “Calculation of the Polycrystalline PV Module Temperature Using a Simple Method of Energy Balance,” Renewable Energy, 31, pp. 553–567. [CrossRef]
Jones, A. D., and Underwood, C. P., 2001. A Thermal Model for Photovoltaic Systems, Sol. Energy, 70(4), pp. 349–359. [CrossRef]
Prorok, M., Kolodenny, W., Zdanowicz, T., Gottschalg, R., and Stellbogen, D., 2008, “Reducing Uncertainty of PV Module Temperature Determination Based on Analysis Using Data Gained During Outdoor Monitoring,” Proc. 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, September 6–10, pp. 2865–2871.
Krauter, S., and Preiss, A., 2009, “Comparison of Module Temperature Measurement Methods,” Proceedings of 34th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Philadelphia, PA, June 7–12, pp. 333–338. [CrossRef]
Eke, R., Kavasoglu, S., and Kavasoglu, N., 2012, “Design and Implementation of a Low-Cost Multi-Channel Temperature Measurement System for Photovoltaic Modules,” Measurement, 45(6), pp. 1499–1509. [CrossRef]
Meijer, G. C. M., 2001, “Temperature Sensors and Voltage References Implemented in CMOS Technology,” IEEE Sens. J., 1(3), pp. 225–234. [CrossRef]
Belmili, H., Cheikh, S. M. A., Haddadi, M., and Larbes, C., 2010, “Design and Development of a Data Acquisition System for Photovoltaic Modules Characterization,” Renewable Energy, 35, pp. 1484–1492. [CrossRef]
Bohorquez, M. A. M., Gomez, J. M. E., and Marquez, J. M. A., 2009, “A New and Inexpensive Temperature-Measuring System: Application to Photovoltaic Solar Facilities,” Sol. Energy, 83, pp. 883–890. [CrossRef]
Jankovec, M., Brecl, K., Kurnik, J., Stepan, J., and Topič, M., 2010, “Evaluation of Different Temperature Measurement Methods of Crystalline Silicon PV Modules,” 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference/5th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Valencia, Spain, September 6–10, pp. 4257–4260.
Granek, F., and Zdanowicz, T., 2004, “Advanced System for Calibration and Characterization of Solar Cells,” Optoelectron. Rev., 12(1), pp. 57–67.
ISO/IEC, 2008, Guide 98-3, Uncertainty of Measurement—Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM:1995), 1st ed., ISO/IEC, Geneva.
Kurnik, J., Jankovec, M., Brecl, K., and Topič, M., 2011, “Outdoor Testing of PV Module Temperature and Performance Under Different Mounting and Operational Conditions,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 95(1), pp. 373–376. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Locations of laminated PT sensors in the PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Locations and attachment of sensors in the center of the cell A

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A photo of sensors attached at the white back sheet at the center of the cell A. Location of the laminated PT sensor is marked by a dot on the back sheet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Temperature difference of temperature under the center of cell A according to two other locations versus temperature difference of the temperature at the center of cell A and air temperature (regression lines added)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Junction temperature difference between Voc methods and the temperature of at the back side at the center of cell A in three cases, where different parameters were used in the Voc method. Pairs of lines show the 95 percentile range of each data sets.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temperature, irradiance, and air flow data acquired during a clear sky day

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Temperature and irradiance data at different times of the day in Fig. 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Response of temperature sensors and temperature calculated from Voc during covering and uncovering of the PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Air and sensors temperatures during the shading of the PV module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Temperature deviations of each sensor measurement method according to the reference temperature, which was calculated from Voc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

DS sensor (DS18B20) covered by a XPS block with lateral insulation thickness of 3 mm (left hand side) and 10 mm (right hand side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Average temperature deviations between DS and PT sensor at the center of the cell A using different wall thicknesses of XPS insulation on DS sensor

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In