Research Papers

A Numerical Study of Atmospheric and Wake Turbulence Impacts on Wind Turbine Fatigue Loadings

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Lee

e-mail: Sang.Lee@nrel.gov

J. Michalakes

National Wind Technology Center,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
15013 Denver West Parkway, MS 3811,
Golden, CO 80401

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. Manuscript received February 10, 2012; final manuscript received October 19, 2012; published online February 8, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Christian Masson.

The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States government purposes.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 135(3), 031001 (Feb 08, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: SOL-12-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4023319 History: Received February 10, 2012; Revised October 19, 2012

Large-eddy simulations of atmospheric boundary layers under various stability and surface roughness conditions are performed to investigate the turbulence impact on wind turbines. In particular, the aeroelastic responses of the turbines are studied to characterize the fatigue loading of the turbulence present in the boundary layer and in the wake of the turbines. Two utility-scale 5 MW turbines that are separated by seven rotor diameters are placed in a 3 km by 3 km by 1 km domain. They are subjected to atmospheric turbulent boundary layer flow and data are collected on the structural response of the turbine components. The surface roughness was found to increase the fatigue loads while the atmospheric instability had a small influence. Furthermore, the downstream turbines yielded higher fatigue loads indicating that the turbulent wakes generated from the upstream turbines have significant impact.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the computational domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Instantaneous isosurfaces of the horizontal component (blue, −1.25 m/s) and the vertical component (red, 1 m/s) of velocity for (a) NL, (b) NH, (c) UL, and (d) UH

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Mean streamwise velocity profile and (b) energy spectra for various ABL conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Two NREL 5 MW turbines subjected to NL atmospheric conditions showing the instantaneous streamwise velocity with streamlines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Moments measured at various locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time history of moment signals for (a) Moop for WT1, (b) Moop for WT2, (c) Mtwr-y for WT1, and (d) Mtwr-y for WT2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Damage equivalent load for (a) Mip, (b) Moop, (c) Mlss-x, (d) Myaw, (e) Mtwr-x, and (f) Mtwr-y

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Probability of exceedance for rainflow cycle counts of (a) Moop, (b) Myaw, (c) Mtwr-x, and (d) Mtwr-y

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Energy spectra for blade root moments for (a) in-plane: Mip and (b) out-of-plane: Moop, (c) yaw moment at the tower-top yaw bearing: Myaw, (d) torque at the low-speed-shaft of the rotor: Mlss-x, (e) side-to-side moment at the tower base: Mtwr-x, and (f) fore-aft moment at the tower base: Mtwr-y




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In