0
Research Papers

The Effect of Dark Periods on the UV Photolytic and Photocatalytic Disinfection of Escherichia coli in a Continuous Flow Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
David B. Misstear

e-mail: missted@tcd.ie

John P. Murtagh

e-mail: murtagjp@tcd.ie

Laurence W. Gill

e-mail: gilll@tcd.ie
Department of Civil,
Structural and Environmental Engineering,
Trinity College,
Dublin 2, Ireland

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. Manuscript received April 4, 2011; final manuscript received October 8, 2012; published online January 25, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wojciech Lipinski.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 135(2), 021012 (Jan 25, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: SOL-11-1089; doi: 10.1115/1.4023179 History: Received April 04, 2011; Revised October 08, 2012

An investigation into the effect of different lengths of intermittent light/dark periods on the photolytic and photocatalytic disinfection of Escherichia coli was undertaken at laboratory scale. Water containing E. coli was pumped around a laboratory scale compound parabolic collector and exposed to UV light in the presence and absence of titanium dioxide photocatalyst. By darkening sections of the reactor tubing, the illumination time and frequency were varied. The disinfection kinetics were studied, as well as the effective disinfection time received for each configuration. For photolysis, it was seen that the number of dark and light periods had very little effect on disinfection, once the illuminated area was kept constant, although having fewer light/dark interfaces was slightly favorable. It was also seen that an increase in the illuminated area reduced the efficiency of disinfection in relation to cumulative UV dose. In photocatalytic tests, it was found that increasing the frequency of light/dark periods, while keeping the illuminated area constant, had a beneficial effect on disinfection, both in terms of time to method detection limit (MDL) and effective disinfection time (EDT). In post irradiation tests, where samples were kept in the dark for 48 h after illumination, photocatalysis was seen to have a distinct advantage over photolysis, with total inactivation achieved within 60 min for all configurations, as opposed to a minimum of 180 min in photolytic tests. From an engineering design perspective, the above findings could lead to smaller, more efficient reactor configurations. The implications that more interruptions improve photocatalytic disinfection could be implemented by introducing light and dark periods into photocatalytic reactor systems, subject to further testing.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Downes, A., and Blunt, T. P., 1877, “Researches on the Effect of Light Upon Bacteria and Other Organisms,” Proc. R. Soc. London, 26, pp. 488–500. [CrossRef]
Blake, D. M., Maness, P. C., Huang, Z., Wolfrum, J., and Huang, J., 1999, “Application of the Photocatalytic Chemistry of Titanium Dioxide to Disinfection and the Killing of Cancer Cells,” Sep. Purif. Methods, 28, pp. 1–50. [CrossRef]
Oates, P. M., Shanahan, P., and Polz, M. F., 2003, “Solar Disinfection (SODIS) for Point-of-Use Water Treatment in Haiti and Simulation of Solar Radiation Global for Global SODIS Assessment,” Water Res., 37, pp. 47–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wegelin, M., Canonica, S., Mechsner, K., Pesaro, F., and Metzler, A., 1994, “Solar Water Disinfection: Scope of the Process and Analysis of Radiation Experiments,” J. Water Supply: Res. Technol.-AQUA, 43, pp. 154–169.
Gill, L. W., and McLoughlin, O. A., 2007, “Solar Disinfection Kinetic Design Parameters for Continuous Flow Reactors,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129, pp. 111–118. [CrossRef]
Matsunaga, T., 1985, “Sterilization With Particulate Photosemiconductor,” J. Antibacterial Antifungal Agents, 13, pp. 211–220.
Block, S. S., Seng, V. P., and Goswami, D. W., 1997, “Chemically Enhanced Sunlight for Killing Bacteria,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 119, pp. 85–91. [CrossRef]
Ibáñez, J. A., Litter, M. I., and Pizarro, R. A., 2003, “Photocatalytic Bactericidal Effect of TiO2 on Enterobacter Cloacae—Comparative Study With Other Gram (-) Bacteria,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 157, pp. 81–85. [CrossRef]
Kühn, K. P., Chaberny, I. F., Massholder, K., Stickler, M., Benz, V. W., Sonntag, H.-G., and Erdinger, L., 2003, “Disinfection of Surfaces by Photocatalytic Oxidation With Titanium Dioxide and UVA Light,” Chemosphere, 53, pp. 71–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Benabbou, A. K., Derriche, Z., Felix, C., Lejeune, P., and Guillard, C., 2007, “Photocatalytic Inactivation of Escherichia coli,” Appl. Catal., B, 76, pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Sunada, K., Watanabe, T., and Hashimoto, K., 2003, “Studies on Photokilling of Bacteria on. TiO2 Thin Film,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 156, pp. 227–233. [CrossRef]
Lanao, M., Ormad, M. P., Mosteo, R., and Ovelleiro, J. L., 2012, “Inactivation of Enterococcus sp. by Photolysis and TiO2 Photocatalysis With H2O2 in Natural Water,” Sol. Energy, 86(1), pp. 619–625. [CrossRef]
Dunlop, P. S. M., Ciavola, M., Rizzo, L., and Byrne, J. A., 2011, “Inactivation and Injury Assessment of Escherichia coli During Solar and Photocatalytic Disinfection in LDPE Bags,” Chemosphere, 85(7), pp. 1160–1166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Van Grieken, R., Marugán, J., Pablos, C., Furones, L., and López, A., 2010, “Comparison Between the Photocatalytic Inactivation of Gram-Positive E. faecalis and Gram-Negative E. coli Faecal Contamination Indicator Microorganisms,” Appl. Catal., B, 100(1–2), pp. 212–220. [CrossRef]
Watts, R. J., Kong, S., Orr, M. P., Miller, G. C., and Henry, B. E., 1995, “Photocatalytic Inactivation of Coliform Bacteria and Viruses in Secondary Wastewater Effluent,” Water Res., 29(1), pp. 95–100. [CrossRef]
Sjogren, J. C., and Sierka, R. A., 1994, “Inactivation of Phage MS2 by Iron-Aided Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysis,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60(1), pp. 344–347. [PubMed]
Laot, N., Narkis, N., Neeman, I., Bilanoviç, D., and Armon, R., 1999, “TiO2 Photocatalytic Inactivation of Selected Microorganisms Under Various Conditions: Sunlight, Intermittent and Variable Irradiation Intensity, CDS Supplementation and Entrapment of TiO2 into Sol-Gel,” J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 4(1), pp. 97–102.
Liga, M. V., Bryant, E. L., Colvin, V. L., and Li, Q., 2011, “Virus Inactivation by Silver Doped Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for Drinking Water Treatment,” Water Res., 45(2), pp. 535–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dunlop, P. S. M., McMurray, T. A., Hamilton, J. W. J., and Byrne, A., 2008, “Photocatalytic Inactivation of Clostridium Perfringens Spores on TiO2 Electrodes,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 196(1), pp. 113–119. [CrossRef]
Méndez-Hermida, F., Ares-Mazás, E., McGuigan, K. G., Boyle, M., Sichel, C., and Fernández-Ibáñez, P., 2007, “Disinfection of Drinking Water Contaminated With Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocysts Under Natural Sunlight and Using the Photocatalyst TiO2,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 88, pp. 105–111. [CrossRef]
Lonnen, J., Kilvington, S., Kehoe, S. C., Al-Touati, F., and McGuigan, K. G., 2005, “Solar and Photocatalytic Disinfection of Protozoan, Fungal and Bacterial Microbes in Drinking Water,” Water Res., 39, pp. 877–883. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sunnotel, O., Verdoold, R., Dunlop, P. S. M., Snelling, W. J., Lowery, C. J., Dooley, J. S. G., Moore, J. E., and Byrne, J. A., 2010, “Photocatalytic Inactivation of Cryptosporidium Parvum on Nanostructured Titanium Dioxide Films,” J. Water Health, 8(1), pp. 83–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sichel, C., Tello, J., de Cara, M., and Fernández-Ibáñez, P., 2007, “Effect of UV—Intensity and Dose on the Photocatalytic Disinfection of Bacteria and Fungi Under Natural Sunlight,” Catal. Today, 129, pp. 152–160. [CrossRef]
Maness, P. C., Smolinski, S., Blake, D. M., Huang, Z., Wolfrum, E. J., and Jacoby, W. A., 1999, “Bactericidal Activity of Photocatalytic TiO2 Reaction: Toward an Understanding of Its Killing Mechanism,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65(9), pp. 4094–4098. [PubMed]
Cho, M., Chung, H., Choi, W., and Yoon, J., 2004, “Linear Correlation Between Inactivation of E. coli and OH Radical Concentration in TiO2 Photocatalytic Disinfection,” Water Res., 38, pp. 1069–1077. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pigeot-Rémy, S., Simonet, F., Errazuriz-Cerda, E., Lazzaroni, J. C., Atlan, D., and Guillard, C., 2011, “Photocatalysis and Disinfection of Water: Identification of Potential Targets,” Appl. Catal., B, 104(3–4), pp. 390–398. [CrossRef]
McLoughlin, O. A., Kehoe, S. C., McGuigan, K. G., Duffy, E. F., Al Touati, F., Gernjak, W., Oller Alberola, I., Malato Rodriguez, S., and Gill, L. W., 2004, “Solar Disinfection of Contaminated Water: A Comparison of Three Small-Scale Reactors,” Sol. Energy, 77(5), pp. 657–664. [CrossRef]
Navntoft, C., Araujo, P., Litter, M. I., Apella, M. C., Fernández, D., Puchulu, M. E., Hidalgo, M.delV., and Blesa, M. A., 2007, “Field Tests of the Solar Water Detoxification SOLWATER Reactor in Los Pereyra, Tucumán, Argentina,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., 129, pp. 127–134. [CrossRef]
Chapelon, A., and Herrmann, J. M., 2004, “The AQUACAT Project/Detoxification and Potabilisation of Water by Solar Photocatalysis in Semi-Arid Countries,” Appl. Catal., B, 50, pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
Gill, L. W., and Price, C., 2010, “Preliminary Observations of a Continuous Flow Solar Disinfection System for a Rural Community in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Energy, 35, pp. 4607–4611. [CrossRef]
Gelover, S., Gómez, L.A., Reyes, K., and Teresa Leal, M., 2006, “A Practical Demonstration of Water Disinfection Using TiO2 Films and Sunlight,” Water Res., 40, pp. 3274–3280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rincón, A.-G., and Pulgarin, C., 2007, “Absence of E-Coli Regrowth After Fe3+ And TiO2 Solar Photoassisted Disinfection of Water In CPC Solar Photoreactor,” Catal. Today, 124, pp. 204–214. [CrossRef]
Berney, M., Weilenmann, H.-U., and Egli, T., 2007, “Adaptation to UVA Radiation of E. coli Growing in Continuous Culture,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 86, pp. 149–159. [CrossRef]
McLoughlin, O. A., Fernandez, P., Gernjak, W., Malato, S., and Gill, L. W., 2004, “Photocatalytic Disinfection of Water Using Low Cost Compound Parabolic Collectors,” Sol. Energy, 77(5), pp. 625–633. [CrossRef]
Fernández, P., Blanco, J., Sichel, C., and Malato, S., 2005, “Water Disinfection by Solar Photocatalysis Using Compound Parabolic Collectors,” Catal. Today, 101, pp. 345–352. [CrossRef]
Rincón, A. G., and Pulgarin, C., 2003, “Photocatalytical Inactivation of E. coli: Effect of (Continuous-Intermittent) Light Intensity and of (Suspended-Fixed) TiO2 Concentration,” Appl. Catal., B, 44, pp. 263–284. [CrossRef]
Pham, H. N., McDowell, T., and Wilkins, E., 1995, “Photocatalytically-Mediated Disinfection of Water Using TiO2 as a Catalyst and Spore-Forming Bacillus pumilus as a Model,” J. Environ. Sci. Health, A30(3), pp. 627–636. [CrossRef]
Gumy, D., Rincón, A. G., Hajdu, R., and Pulgarin, C., 2006, “Solar Photocatalysis for Detoxification and Disinfection of Water: Different Types of Suspended and Fixed TiO2 Catalysts Study,” Sol. Energy, 80(10), pp. 1376–1381. [CrossRef]
Sichel, C., Blanco, J., Malato, S., and Fernández-Ibáñez, P., 2007, “Effects of Experimental Conditions on E. coli Survival During Solar Photocatalytic Water Disinfection,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 189, pp. 239–246. [CrossRef]
Rincón, A.-G., and Pulgarin, C., 2004, “Field Solar E. coli Inactivation in the Absence and Presence of TiO2: Is UV Solar Dose an Appropriate Parameter for Standardization of Water Solar Disinfection?,” Sol. Energy, 77, pp. 635–648. [CrossRef]
Berney, M., Weilenmann, H.-U., Simonetti, A., and Egli, T., 2006, “Efficacy of Solar Disinfection of Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Vibrio cholera,” J. Appl. Microbiol., 101, pp. 828–836. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rincón, A. G., and Pulgarin, C., 2004, “Bactericidal Action of Illuminated TiO2 on Pure E. coli and Natural Bacteria Consortia: Post-Irradiation Events in the Dark Assessment of the Effective Disinfection Time,” Appl. Catal., B, 49(2), pp. 99–112. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illumination regimes (Note: the time spent in the reservoir and flowing to and from the reactor is not included in the above diagrams)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Plot of log (Nt/N0) against (a) time; and (b) cumulative UV dose for 0 mg/l TiO2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of disinfection rates for different numbers of openings, with constant effective illuminated area of 3 pipes. No photocatalyst present. (Ж Dark experiment, 0 mg/l TiO2; dark experiment, 50 mg/l TiO2; • 6 openings (config. 8); ♦ 12 openings (config. 9); ▴ 18 openings (config. 7); ▪ 42 openings (config. 11)). Note: error bars are just on one line to avoid confusion.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of log (Nt/N0) against (a) time and (b) cumulative UV dose for 50 mg/l TiO2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of disinfection rates for different numbers of openings, with constant effective illuminated area of 1 pipe. 50 mg/l photocatalyst present. (Ж Dark experiment, 0 mg/l TiO2; ○ dark experiment, 50 mg/l TiO2; ♦ 1 opening (config. 2); • 6 openings (config. 6); ▪ 12 openings (config. 4); ▴ 18 openings (config. 5)). Note: error bars are just on one line to avoid confusion.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of optimal 1 pipe configuration with 3 and 6 pipe configurations. (Ж Dark experiment, 0 mg/l TiO2; ○ dark experiment, 50 mg/l TiO2; ♦ 1 pipe area (config. 5); ▴ 3 pipe area (config. 1); ▪ 6 pipe area (config. 10)). Note: error bars are just on one line to avoid confusion.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In