0
Research Papers

A Feasibility Study of Using Solar Liquid-Desiccant Air Conditioner in Queensland, Australia

[+] Author and Article Information
Shahab Alizadeh1

Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane 4001, Australiashahaḇalizadeh@hotmail.com

1

Present address: Department of Energy, Materials & Energy Research Centre, P.O. Box 14155-4777, Tehran, Iran.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 130(2), 021005 (Mar 10, 2008) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2844426 History: Received October 29, 2005; Revised August 25, 2007; Published March 10, 2008

A feasibility study of using solar liquid-desiccant air conditioner (LDAC) developed in Queensland has been undertaken. The system uses high effectiveness cross-flow polymer plate heat exchanger (PPHE), as the absorber unit. Outside air is dehumidified by strong liquid desiccant and indirectly cooled within the PPHE. The warm dry air is, subsequently, cooled and humidified through a direct evaporative cooler and supplied to the conditioned space. The weak desiccant solution from the absorber unit is concentrated in a scavenger air regenerator using hot water from flat plate solar collectors. The prototype of the absorber unit of the liquid-desiccant system has been tested under the summer conditions of Brisbane, using lithium chloride as the absorbent solution. The results of the experiments indicate that they are in good agreement with a previously developed model for the absorber unit. The tests further reveal that the unit has a satisfactory performance in controlling the air temperature and relative humidity when installed on a commercial site of 120m2 area in Brisbane. A commercialization strategy has been proposed in this study for a solar operated LDAC in Queensland and compared with the conventional direct expansion (DX) system. Based on the computer modeling results obtained from the system simulation for a building in Cairns, North Queensland, the operating costs of the LDAC are significantly lower than its conventional DX counterpart. This study further reveals that using the solar operated LDAC with a storage system will result in considerable savings in operating costs when compared with the equivalent gas-fired system. A simple payback of five years was determined for the solar components in this study.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Supply air temperature versus conditioner air flow ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Supply air humidity ratio versus conditioner air flow ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Collector efficiency as a function of temperature difference. (Edwards Hot Water Pty Ltd.)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the cross-flow type plate heat exchanger, showing (a) the supply and return air channels and (b) the air and liquid flowing in counter current directions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic diagram of the liquid-desiccant solar air conditioner

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Three dimensional view of the LDAC absorber unit

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Power consumed by the fans as a function of the voltage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Conductivity-concentration chart for the lithium chloride solution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Psychrometric paths for the tests with (a) desiccant only (dashed line) and (b) with water and desiccant (supply air, 0-1-2-3; return air, R-S)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Supply air temperature versus desiccant flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Supply air humidity ratio versus desiccant flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Variation of the power consumed by the solution pump versus voltage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Conditioner effectiveness as a function of the supply air flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Conditioner dehumidification efficiency as a function of solution flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Schematic of the scavenger air solar regenerator

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

The solar LDAC performance flow chart showing the control systems for the conditioner and regenerator, using summer design conditions of Brisbane

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Schematic diagram of the 1-1∕2 effect regenerator (Lowenstein, 2004)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Seasonal performance of the LDAC

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In