Research Papers

Considerations for the Design of Solar-Thermal Chemical Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
Janna Martinek, Melinda Channel

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

Allan Lewandowski

 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401

Alan W. Weimer1

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309alan.weimer@colorado.edu


Corresponding author.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 132(3), 031013 (Jun 21, 2010) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4001474 History: Received December 14, 2009; Revised January 07, 2010; Published June 21, 2010; Online June 21, 2010

A methodology is presented for the design of solar thermal chemical processes. The solar receiver efficiency for the high temperature step, defined herein as the ratio of the enthalpy change resulting from the process occurring in the receiver to the solar energy input, is limited by the solar energy absorption efficiency. When using this definition of receiver efficiency, both the optimal reactor temperature for a given solar concentration ratio and the solar concentration required to achieve a given temperature and efficiency shift to lower values than those dictated by the Carnot limitation on the system efficiency for the conversion of heat to work. Process and solar field design considerations were investigated for ZnO and NiFe2O4 “ferrite” spinel water splitting cycles with concentration ratios of roughly 2000, 4000, and 8000 suns to assess the implications of using reduced solar concentration. Solar field design and determination of field efficiency were accomplished using ray trace modeling of the optical components. Annual solar efficiency increased while heliostat area decreased with increasing concentration due to shading and blocking effects. The heliostat fields designed using system efficiency for the conversion of heat to work were found to be overdesigned by up to 21% compared with those designed using the receiver efficiency alone. Overall efficiencies of 13–20% were determined for a “ferrite” based water splitting process with thermal reduction conversions in the range of 35–100%.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

System boundaries for the solar receiver (dot-dashed line) and for the overall conversion of heat to work (dashed line) via a metal oxide water splitting cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Definition of efficiencies

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Overall receiver efficiency ηabs (solid lines) and system efficiency (dashed lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic multiple field/tower layout (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Daggett, CA TMY2 data (average hourly values)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Design point efficiency ηs to process for north field. Side field efficiencies are slightly less on a daily basis.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Annual energy delivered to reaction including all three fields per tower

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Equilibrium composition for (a) ZnO with 3 mol Ar per mol solid reactant and total p=1 bar and (b) NiFe2O4 with 104 mol Ar per mol solid reactant and total p=1 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

ZnO process flow diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

NiFe2O4 process flow diagram



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In