0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Solar Photolytic and Photocatalytic Disinfection of Water at Laboratory and Field Scale. Effect of the Chemical Composition of Water and Study of the Postirradiation Events

[+] Author and Article Information
Angela-Guiovana Rincón

 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Institut de Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, GGEC, Bâtiment CH, Station 6, Lausanne, CH-1015 Switzerlandangela.ricon-benavides@epfl.ch

Cesar Pulgarin

 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Institut de Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, GGEC, Bâtiment CH, Station 6, Lausanne, CH-1015 Switzerlandcesar.pulgarin@epfl.ch

J. Sol. Energy Eng 129(1), 100-110 (Jan 30, 2006) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2391308 History: Received July 18, 2005; Revised January 30, 2006

Background. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the development of new processes for water disinfection since the traditional processes, such as chlorination, can lead to the production of toxic disinfection by-products. Sunlight has been used as a method of water disinfection and heliophotocatalysis by titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been recently considered as a new approach to improve the conventional solar water disinfection. This paper discusses the effect of the chemical composition of water on the E. coli photo inactivation. Method of Approach. Ten types of water having a different chemical composition were contaminated by E. coli K12 and exposed to a simulated solar irradiation in the absence of TiO2 (photolysis) and in presence of TiO2 (photocatalysis). Bacteria were monitored by plate count. The durability of disinfection was assessed in terms of the effective disinfection time (EDT) in a subsequent dark period of 24h(EDT24). Natural water from the Leman Lake (LLW), milli-Q water (MQW), MQW containing a mixture of NO3, PO43, SO42, Cl and HCO3, phosphate buffered saline water, water from the outlet of a biological wastewater treatment plant (WW); MQW containing a mixture of KCl-NaCl and commercial bottled drinking water (CBW) where used to suspend E. coli at laboratory scale. Field scale experiments using solar irradiation in a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) with E. coli suspended in LLW were also carried out. Results. The sensitivity of bacteria to the phototreatment depends on the nature of the water. Moreover, experiments systematically performed under the solar simulator showed that the order of E. coli inactivation rate and the EDT24 are different for each system. In photolytic systems, E. coli solar inactivation rate is accelerated by the presence in water of NO3 and HCO3 when compared to that observed in MQW. EDT24 was reached at 3h of irradiation for only 3 (WLL, WW1, and CBW) of the ten studied waters. In the presence of TiO2, the rate of the solar disinfection generally increased. However, a negative effect of chemical substances present in water on the E. coli photocatalytic inactivation was observed in waters when compared to MQW. This effect was especially important in the presence of phosphate, and carbonate. EDT24 was less than 2h for the majority of the water types. In the presence of TiO2, a “residual disinfection effect” was observed for samples even when bacterial culturability below the detection limit was not reached after photocatalytic treatment. Solar irradiation in a CPC photoreactor indicates that the presence of TiO2 accelerates the detrimental action of sunlight. The EDT24 was reached before 3h, in photocatalytic experiments but not in those in the absence of TiO2. The influence of TiO2 surface characteristics and charge, as well as the postirradiation events observed in heliophototreated water, in an optimal growth medium are also discussed. Conclusions. The presence of NO3, HCO3, PO43, SO42, Cl, and HCO3 greatly affects the photolytic and photocatalytic disinfection processes. The natural ions and organic matter affect the solar disinfection of water in the presence and absence of TiO2 and influences the post irradiation events after sunlight illumination. Antagonistic effect in several conditions or synergistic effects in others can be expected when inorganic and/or organic substances are present in phototreated water sources. EDT24 is useful tool for standardization of solar water disinfection. EDT24 values depend on parameters such as the chemical composition of water, light intensity, initial bacterial concentration, and TiO2 concentration.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Inactivation of E. coli by sunlight in a CPC photoreactor. The inset contains the UV(_) and total (…) solar irradiation measured during the period of the experiment. September 25 and 26, 2003, in Lausanne, Switzerland. Dark control for samples that corresponds to 0, 1, 2, and 3h of the illumination exposure. Conditions: VTOT=35L, recirculation rate=20.5L∕min, illumination time=3(a) and 5h(b), natural pH. Type of water: LLW. The bars show the SD of four samples.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Inactivation of E. coli by sunlight in the presence of TiO2 in CPC photoreactor. The inset contains the UV(_) and total (…) solar irradiation measured during the period of the experiment. September 27, 2003 in Lausanne, Switzerland. Dark control for samples that corresponds to 0, 1, 2, and 3h of the illumination exposure. Conditions: TiO2=0.02g∕L, VTOT=35L, recirculation rate=20.5L∕min, illumination time=3h. Type of water: LLW. The bars show the SD of four samples taken at the same moment. Initial concentration 105CFU∕mL.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Photolytic inactivation of E. coli suspended in water with different chemical composition. Light was generated by a solar simulator. At 1000W∕m2 of light intensity. WS1(◇), WS2(◆), WS3(●), LLW(⋆), CBW(_), MQW(∎), WS4(▵), WS5(†), WW1(엯), WW2(▴). Table 1 shows the composition of different solutions.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

E. coli inactivation in the presence (open symbols) and absence of TiO2 (full symbols) using different water types: (a) WS2, (b) MQW, (c) WS1, (d) WW1, (e) LLW, (f) WS3, (g) WS5, (h) CBW, (i) WS4, and (j) WW2. Table 1 shows the composition of different solutions.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Photocatalytic inactivation via TiO2 of E. coli suspended in water with different chemical composition. Light was generated by a solar simulator. At 1000W∕m2 of light intensity. WS 1 (◇), WS 2 (◆), WS 3 (•), LLW (*), CBW (_), MQW (∎), WS4 (▵), WS5 (†), WW1 (엯), WW2 (▴). Table 1 shows the composition of different solutions.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Time required to reach 99.999% of E. coli K12 inactivation by photocatalysis as a function of NaCl concentration between 0.02 and 260mmol∕L

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Durability of solar disinfection without catalyst experiments of Fig.  55: (a) September 25 and (b) September 26, 2003. Initial and final samples were incubated for 24h in the dark.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Durability of solar disinfection: with TiO2 catalyst, experiment of September 27, 2003. (a) Incubation without any modification in the chemical composition of water. (b) Initial and final sample were incubated in LB media during 24h.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Durability of solar disinfection: without catalyst, (a) experiment of September 25 and (b) September 26, 2003. Initial and final sample were incubated in LB media during 24h.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In