Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Modeling of a Solar Chemical Reactor for The Co-Production of Zinc and Syngas

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefan Kräupl

Solar Process Technology, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland

Aldo Steinfeld

ETH-Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

J. Sol. Energy Eng 127(1), 102-108 (Feb 07, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1824105 History: Received April 27, 2004; Revised May 05, 2004; Online February 07, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Steinfeld,  A., Frei,  A., Kuhn,  P., and Wuillemin,  D., 1995, “Solarthermal Production of Zinc and Syngas Via Combined ZnO-Reduction and CH4-Reforming Processes,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 20, pp. 793–804.
Steinfeld,  A., Larson,  C., Palumbo,  R., and Foley,  M., 1996, “Thermodynamic Analysis of the Co-Production of Zinc and Synthesis Gas Using Solar Process Heat,” Energy Int. J.,21, pp. 205–222.
Werder,  M., and Steinfeld,  A., 2000, “Life Cycle Assessment of the Conventional and Solarthermal Production of Zinc and Synthesis Gas,” Energy, 25, pp. 395–409.
Steinfeld,  A., and Spiewak,  I., 1998, “Economic Evaluation of the Solar Thermal Co-Production of Zinc and Synthesis Gas,” Energy Convers. Manage., 39, pp. 1513–1518.
Steinfeld,  A., Brack,  M., Meier,  A., Weidenkaff,  A., and Wuillemin,  D., 1998, “A Solar Chemical Reactor for the Co-Production of Zinc and Synthesis Gas,” Energy,23, pp. 803–814.
Kräupl,  S., and Steinfeld,  A., 2001, “Experimental Investigation of a Vortex-Flow Solar Chemical Reactor for the Combined ZnO-Reduction and CH4-Reforming,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 123, pp. 237–243.
Kräupl,  S., and Steinfeld,  A., 2003, “Operational Performance of a 5 kW Solar Chemical Reactor for the Co-Production of Zinc and Syngas,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 125, pp. 124–126.
Siegel, R., and Howell, J. R., 2002, Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, 4th ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, Chaps. 10.5 and 17.5.
Modest, M. F., 2003, Radiative Heat Transfer, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York, Chap. 20.
Mahan, J. R., 2002, Radiation Heat Transfer: A Statistical Approach, Wiley, New York, Part III.
Wen-Jei, Y., Hiroshi, T., and Kazuhiko, K., 1995, “Radiative Heat Transfer by the Monte Carlo Method,” in Advances in Heat Transfer, 27 , Academic Press, San Diego.
Farmer, J. T., and Howell, J. R., 1998, “Comparison of Monte Carlo Strategies for Radiative Transfer in Participating Media,” in Advances in Heat Transfer, 31 , Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 333–429.
Howell,  J. R., 1998, “The Monte Carlo Method in Radiative Heat Transfer,” J. Heat Transfer, 120, pp. 547–560.
Marakis,  J. G., Papapavlou,  C., and Kakaras,  E., 2000, “A Parametric Study of Radiative Heat Transfer in Pulverised Coal Furnaces,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 43, pp. 2961–2971.
Tessé,  L., Dupoirieux,  F., Zamuner,  B., and Taine,  J., 2002, “Radiative Transfer in Real Gases Using Reciprocal and Forward Monte Carlo Methods and a Correlated-k Approach,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 2797–2814.
Mischler, D. U., 1995, “Strahlungsübergang in Partikelwolken,” Dissertation No. 11218, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ).
Mischler,  D., and Steinfeld,  A., 1995, “Nonisothermal Nongray Absorbing-Emitting-Scattering Suspension of Fe3O4-Particles Under Concentrated Solar Irradiation,” J. Heat Transfer, 117, pp. 346–354.
Hirsch, D., 2003, “Decarbonization of Fossil Fuels—Hydrogen Production by the Solar Thermal Decomposition of Natural Gas Using a Vortex-Flow Solar Reactor,” Dissertation No. 15212, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ).
Lipinski,  W., and Steinfeld,  A., 2004, “Heterogeneous Thermochemical Decomposition Under Direct Irradiation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, pp. 1907–1916.
Welford, W. T., and Winston, R., 1989, High Collection Nonimaging Optics, Academic Press, San Diego.
Haueter,  P., Seitz,  T., and Steinfeld,  A., 1999, “A New High-Flux Solar Furnace for High-Temperature Thermo-Chemical Research,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 121, pp. 77–80.
Sparrow, E. M., and Cess, R. D., 1978, Radiation Heat Transfer, 3rd ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington.
Lin,  S. H., and Sparrow,  E. M., 1965, “Radiant Interchange Among Curved Specularly Reflecting Surfaces—Application to Cylindrical and Conical Cavities,” J. Heat Transfer, 87, pp. 299–307.
Steinfeld,  A., 1991, “Apparent Absorptance for Diffusely and Specularly Reflecting Sperical Cavities,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 34, pp. 1895–1897.
Steinfeld,  A., 1993, “Radiative Transfer in a Diffusely/Specularly Reflecting Spherical Cavity Containing a Gray Medium,” Wärme und Stoffübertragung (Heat and Mass Transfer), 28, pp. 65–68.
Sparrow,  E. M., and Jonsson,  V. K., 1963, “Thermal Radiation Absorption in Rectangular-Groove Cavities,” J. Appl. Mech., 30, pp. 237–244.
Sparrow,  E. M., and Lin,  S. H., 1962, “Absorption of Thermal Radiation in a V-Groove Cavity,” J. Heat Transfer, 5, pp. 1111–1115.
Steinfeld,  A., and Schubnell,  M., 1993, “Optimum Aperture Size and Operating Temperature of a Solar Cavity-Receiver,” Sol. Energy, 50, pp. 19–25.
National Bureau of Standards, 1985, JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 3rd ed., Washington, D.C.
Barin, I., 1995, Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances, 3rd ed., VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim.
Roine, A., 2002, Outokumpu HSC Chemistry for Windows Version 5.11, Outokumpu Research Oy, Pori, Finland.


Grahic Jump Location
Scheme of the solar cavity-receiver, positioned on-axis with the solar concentrator and with its aperture at the focal plane
Grahic Jump Location
Apparent absorptivity as a function of surface absorptivity for diffuse and specular reflecting inner walls. The baseline configuration was used. The parameter is the aperture size, raperture=2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm.
Grahic Jump Location
Stagnation temperature distribution along the cavity-receiver axis for diffuse and specular reflecting cavity inner walls. The baseline configuration was used for a solar power input of 4 kW. The parameter is the surface absorptivity: α=0.3, 0.5, and 0.8.
Grahic Jump Location
Calculated and measured temperature distribution along the cavity wall. The baseline configuration was used for a solar power input of 1.4 kW.
Grahic Jump Location
Calculated and experimental established thermal efficiency and zinc production rate as a function of temperature, for the baseline configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Variation of the thermal efficiency and zinc production rate with the solar power input for a scaled-up reactor. The parameter is the solar power flux through the reactor aperture: 1000, 1500, and 2000 kW/m2 .




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In