Comparison of Two Sun Tracking Methods in the Application of a Heliostat Field

[+] Author and Article Information
Y. T. Chen

Institute of Energy and Environment, Malaysia University of Science and Technology, C901, Kelana Square, No. 17, Jln SS7/26, Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysiaemail: ytchen@must.edu.my

A. Kribus

Dept. of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel   email: kribus@yarkon.eng.tau.ac.il

B. H. Lim, C. S. Lim, K. K. Chong

Institute of Energy and Environment, Malaysia University of Science and Technology, C901, Kelana Square, No. 17, Jln SS7/26, Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia  

J. Karni

Environmental Science and Energy Research Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel   email: Jacob.karni@weizmann.ac.il

R. Buck, A. Pfahl

Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, Stuttgart 70569, Germany

T. P. Bligh

Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdomemail: tpb@eng.cam.ac.uk

J. Sol. Energy Eng 126(1), 638-644 (Feb 12, 2004) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1634583 History: Received January 01, 2003; Revised April 01, 2003; Online February 12, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Igel,  E. A., and Hughes,  R. L., 1979, “Optical Analysis of Solar Facility Heliostat,” Sol. Energy, 22, pp. 283–295.
Kribus,  A., and Ries,  H., “LiMoNAED: a Limited Motion, Non-Shading, Asymmetric, Ecliptic-Tracking Dish,” Sol. Energy73, pp. 337–344.
Ries,  H., and Schubnell,  M., 1990, “The Optics of a Two-Stage Solar Furnace,” Solar Energy Materials,21, pp. 213–217.
Zaibel,  R., Dagan,  E., Karni,  J., and Ries,  H., 1995, “An Astigmatic Corrected Target-Aligned Heliostat for High Concentration,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells,37, pp. 191–202.
Chen,  Y. T., Chong,  K. K., Bligh,  T. P., Chen,  L. C., Jasmy,  Y., Kannan,  K. S., Lim,  B. H., Lim,  C. S., Alias,  M. A., Noriah,  B., Omar,  A., Sahar,  S., Shk. Abd. Rezan,  S. A. H., Tam,  C. M., and Tan,  K. K., 2001, “Non Imaging Focusing Heliostat,” Sol. Energy, 71, pp. 155–164.
Chen,  Y. T., Chong,  K. K., Lim,  C. S., Lim,  B. H., Tan,  K. K., Omar,  A., Bligh,  T. P., Tan,  B. K., and Ghazally,  I., 2002, “Report of the First Prototype of Non-Imaging Focusing Heliostat and Its Application in High Temperature Solar Furnace,” Sol. Energy, 72, pp. 531–544.
Chen,  Y. T., Chong,  K. K., Lim,  B. H., and Lim,  C. S., 2003, “Study of Residual Aberration for Non-Imaging Focusing Heliostat,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, In Press.
Spirkl,  W., Timinger,  A., Ries,  H., Kribus,  A., and Muschaweck,  J., 1998, “Non-Axisymmetric Reflectors Concentrating Radiation From an Asymmetric Heliostat Field Onto a Circular Absorber,” Sol. Energy, 63, pp. 23–30.
Vant-Hull, L. L., and Pitman, C. L., 1990, “Static and Dynamic Response of a Heliostat Field to Flux Density Limitation on a Central Receiver,” J. T. Beard and M. A. Ebadian (Editors), Solar Engineering, pp. 31–38.
Valverde, A., and Weinrebe, G., 1996, “Implementation of an Automatic Aim-Point Strategy for a Volumetric Receiver in the PSA CESA-1 Heliostat Field,” 8 Int. Symp. Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Becker, M., and Böhmer, M., Eds., Köln, C. F. Müller, 2 , pp. 1047–1065.


Grahic Jump Location
Spot size comparison between the spinning-elevation and azimuth-elevation tracking methods for June 21st. The target angle is 41.8 deg, facing angle is 10 deg to the south and the latitude is North 43 deg. Heliostat area is 25 m2 and the slant range is 30 m.
Grahic Jump Location
The yearly maximum spillage loss is shown as a function of the receiver diameter. Upper curve: traditional heliostat. Lower curve: new heliostat.
Grahic Jump Location
The flow chart of smoothing process
Grahic Jump Location
The schematic diagram shows the difference between the two kinds of sun tracking methods: (a) azimuth-elevation; (b) spinning-elevation.
Grahic Jump Location
The definitions of geometric parameters used in the comparison of heliostats
Grahic Jump Location
The layout shows the heliostat field used for comparison between the two types of heliostat design. The dimensions shown are in meters. The tower height is 20 m. The specifications for each heliostat are given in Table 1.
Grahic Jump Location
The comparison of image spread for heliostat 7 at different times on June 21. The dimensions shown are in centimeters. Each point represents the intersection on the target plane of a central ray from an individual facet. Left side: traditional heliostat; right side: non-imaging focusing heliostat. (a) 7 am. (b) 9 am. (c) 11 am. (d) 1 pm. (e) 3 pm.
Grahic Jump Location
The characteristic curves for heliostat 7 at different times during June 21. (a) Traditional heliostat. (b) Non-imaging focusing heliostat.
Grahic Jump Location
The smoothing procedure is demonstrated for heliostats 3, 4, 5 and 6 during Nov. 21 (a) Presetting time for all four heliostats are the same i.e. 2 pm, 21st Jan. (b) The presetting time for each heliostat is optimized to produce a relatively uniform distribution during daily operation.
Grahic Jump Location
The best and worst characteristic curves for both sun-tracking methods are plotted. The characteristic curves for all other times are within the two limits.
Grahic Jump Location
The time variation of spillage loss for the entire field diameter is plotted for both sun-tracking methods during June 21. (a) Receiver aperture diameter is 1 m. (b) Aperture diameter 1.2 m. (c) Aperture diameter 1.4 m.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In