0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Boundary Layer State and Flow Field Structure Underlying Rotational Augmentation of Blade Aerodynamic Response

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Schreck, M. Robinson

Applied Research Division, National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center, Golden, CO 80401

J. Sol. Energy Eng 125(4), 448-456 (Nov 26, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1624087 History: Received January 05, 2003; Revised June 05, 2003; Online November 26, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Butterfield, C., Hansen, A., Simms, D., and Scott, G., 1991, “Dynamic Stall on Wind Turbine Blades,” NREL/TP-257-4510, December. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1994, “Evidence that Aerodynamic Effects, Including Dynamic Stall, Dictate HAWT Structure Loads and Power Generation in Highly Transient Time Frames,” NREL/TP-441-7080, Aug. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., and Robinson, M., 1995, “Dynamic Stall Occurrence on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade,” NREL/TP-442-6912, July. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Robinson, M., Galbraith, R., Shipley, D., and Miller, M., 1995, “Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” AIAA 95-0526, Jan.
Huyer,  S., Simms,  D., and Robinson,  M., 1996, “Unsteady Aerodynamics Associated with a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine,” AIAA J., 34(7) July, pp. 1410–1419.
Robinson, M., Simms, D., Hand, M., and Schreck, S., 1999, “Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics: Three-Dimensional, Unsteady, and Separated Flow Influences,” FEDSM99-S295-01, 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, July.
Schreck, S., Robinson, M., Hand, M., and Simms, D., 2000, “HAWT Dynamic Stall Response Asymmetries Under Yawed Flow Conditions,” AIAA 2000-0040, Jan.
Schreck, S., Robinson, M., Hand, M., and Simms, D., 2001, “Contrasting Blade Flow Field Archetypes in the HAWT Operating Regime,” AIAA 2000-0036, Jan.
Himmelskamp, H., 1945, “Profiluntersuchungen an einem umlaufenden Propeller,” Dissertation, Gottingen; Mitt. Max-Planck-Institut fur Stromungsforschung Gottingen Nr. 2.
Banks,  W., and G.,  Gadd, 1963, “Delaying Effect of Rotation on Laminar Separation,” AIAA J., 1(4), pp. 941–942.
McCroskey,  W., and Yagg,  P., 1968, “Laminar Boundary Layers on Helicopter Rotors in Forward Flight,” AIAA J., 6(10), pp. 1919–1926.
McCroskey, W. J., 1971, “Measurements of Boundary Layer Transition, Separation and Streamline Direction on Rotating Blades,” NASA TN D-6321, April.
Madsen,  H., and Christensen,  H., 1990, “On the Relative Importance of Rotational, Unsteady and Three-Dimensional Effects on the HAWT Rotor Aerodynamics,” Wind Eng., 14(6), pp. 405–415.
Barnsley,  M., and Wellicome,  J., 1992, “Wind Tunnel Investigation of Stall Aerodynamics for a 1.0 m Horizontal Axis Rotor,” J. of Wind Eng.Ind. Aerodyn., 39, pp. 11–21.
Ronsten,  G., 1992, “Static Pressure Measurements on a Rotating and a Non-Rotating 2.375 m Wind Turbine Blade. Comparison With 2-D Calculations,” J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aerodyn., 39, pp. 105–118.
Schreck,  S., and Robinson,  M., 2002, “Rotational Augmentation of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Response,” Wind Energy, 5(2/3), pp. 133–150.
Eggers, A., and Digumarthi, R., 1992, “Approximate Scaling of Rotational Effects on Mean Aerodynamic Moments and Power Generated by CER Blades Operating in Deep-Stalled Flow,” 11th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Jan.
Snel, H., Houwind, R., and Piers, W., 1992, “Sectional Prediction of 3-D Effects for Separated Flow on Rotating Blades,” 18th European Rotorcraft Forum, Sept.
Tangler, J., and Selig, M., 1997, “An Evaluation of an Empirical Model for Stall Delay due to Rotation for HAWTs,” NREL/CP 440-23258, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Corrigan, J., and Schillings, J., 1994, “Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation,” American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialist Conf., Jan.
Butterfield, C., Musial, W., and Simms, D., 1992, “Combined Experiment Phase I Final Report.” NREL/TP-257-4655. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Miller, M., Shipley, D., Young, T., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1995, “Combined Experiment Phase II Data Characterization.” NREL/TP 442-6916, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Fingersh, L., Simms, D., Butterfield, C., and Jenks, M., 1995, “An Overview of the Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase III Data Acquisition System and Instrumentation,” ASME Energy and Environment Expo ’95, Houston, TX, Jan.-Feb.
Acker, T., 1999, “Further Analysis of Data from the Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment, Phase III and Phase IV,” Task 2 Report, Subcontr. XAT-8-18211-01, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M., Fingersh, L., Cotrell, J., Pierce, K., and Robins, M., 1999, “Plans for Testing the NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment 10 m Diameter HAWT in the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel,” NREL/TP-500-27599, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Giguere, P., and Selig, M., 1999, “Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor,” NREL/SR 500-26173, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Zell, P., 1993, “Performance and Test Section Flow Characteristics of the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex 80-by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel,” NASA TM 103920.
Brand, A., 1994, “To Estimate the Angle of Attack of an Airfoil From the Pressure Distribution,” ECN Technical Report, ECN-R-94-002.
Schepers, J., 1995, “Angle of Attack in Aerodynamic Field Measurements on Wind Turbines,” ECN Technical Report.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., and Luttges, M., 1995, “Techniques for the Determination of Local Dynamic Pressure and Angle of Attack on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine,” NREL Technical Report TP-442-7393.
Whale, J., Fisichella, C., and Selig, M., 1995, “Correcting Inflow Measurements from HAWTs Using a Lifting-Surface Code,” AIAA 99-0040, 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symposium.
van Bussel, G., 1995, “The Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Rotors Explored With Asymptotic Expansion Methods,” Thesis Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands.
McCullough, G., and Gault, D., 1952, “Examples of Three Representative Types of Airfoil-Section Stall at Low Speed,” NACA TN-2502.
Mabey,  D., 1972, “Analysis and Correlation of Data on Pressure Fluctuations in Separated Flow,” J. of Aircr., 9(9), pp. 642–645.
Forsching,  H., and Zingel,  H., 1988, “Motion-Induced Unsteady Airloads on an Oscillating Low-Aspect-Ratio Trapezoidal Half-Wing in Separated Flow,” J. Fluids and Struct., 2, pp. 515–539.
Jupp, M., Coton, F., Green, R., and Galbraith, R., 1998, “An Analysis of a Pitching Delta Wing Using High-Resolution Pressure Measurements,” AIAA-98-2743.
Somers, D., “Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,” 1997, NREL/SR-440-6918, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Thwaites, B. (ed.) 1960, Incompressible Aerodynamics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 200–205.
Eggleston, D., 1990, “New Results in Flow Visualization for Wind Turbines,” AWEA Windpower Conference.
Soerensen, N., Michelsen, J., and Schreck, S., 2001, “Detailed Aerodynamic Prediction of the NREL/NASA Ames Wind Tunnel Tests Using CFD,” 2001 European Wind Energy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, July.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment wind turbine in NASA Ames wind tunnel
Grahic Jump Location
Blade cross-section and planform, showing pressure tap locations
Grahic Jump Location
Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment blade twist distribution
Grahic Jump Location
Definition of local inflow angle (LFA)
Grahic Jump Location
Typical surface pressure distribution means for separation (U=10 m/s,r/R=0.63) and impingement (U=14 m/s,r/R=0.30)
Grahic Jump Location
Typical surface pressure standard deviations for separation (U=10 m/s,r/R=0.63) and impingement (U=14 m/s,r/R=0.30)
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic flow field topologies for boundary layer separation (a) and shear layer impingement (b)
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement chordwise location (a), and mean Cn vs. LFA (b), for 0.30 R
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement chordwise location (a), and mean Cn vs. LFA (b), for 0.47 R
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement chordwise location (a), and mean Cn vs. LFA (b), for 0.63 R
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement chordwise location (a), and mean Cn vs. LFA (b), for 0.80 R
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement contours for incipient rotational augmentation. Open symbols=separation, filled symbols=impingement.
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement contours for advanced rotational augmentation. Open symbols=separation, filled symbols=impingement.
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement contour and surface pressure contours for U=10 m/s superimposed. Leading edge at top of figure.
Grahic Jump Location
Separation/impingement contour and surface pressure contours for U=15 m/s superimposed. Leading edge at top of figure.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In