0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Optical In-Situ Assessment of a Nonimaging Secondary Concentrator in a Solar Tower

[+] Author and Article Information
Abraham Kribus

Environmental Sciences and Energy Research Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israele-mail: avi.kribus@weizmann.ac.il

Andreas Timinger

Optics & Energy Concepts, Paul-Gerhardt-Allee 42, D-81245 Munich, Germany

J. Sol. Energy Eng 124(3), 223-229 (Aug 01, 2002) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1488668 History: Received November 01, 2000; Revised February 01, 2002; Online August 01, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
(a) The geometry of the rectangular concentrator used for the remote in-situ measurement. Eight plane facets of trapezoidal shape interconnect a rectangular entrance aperture and a rectangular exit aperture. (b) Representative rays entering the aperture through a transmission region (white) and a rejection region (hatched); white circles indicate the points of penetration at the inlet aperture. Rays 1 and 2 reach the exit aperture directly and after one reflection, respectively. Ray 3 is rejected after two reflections.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) The layout of the Weizmann Institute heliostat field. The positions of the heliostats are marked as squares. The lines are equal transmission contours as predicted by ray-tracing simulations. The positions of observation for the measurement are shown as numbered dots. (b) The measurement system.
Grahic Jump Location
Transmission pattern photograph corresponding to position 1. Transmission regions are the two relatively uniform horizontal gray strips (bright orange in the original color photograph).
Grahic Jump Location
Photographs of the transmission patterns after pre-processing. Numbers indicate the positions of observation. The different resolution of the photographs is due to the different camera distance to the concentrator for the different positions within the field.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Simulated transmission pattern for the observation position 1. Gray levels correspond to different numbers of reflections. (b) The differences between the measured and simulated patterns; simulated geometry of the concentrator was according to the original design.
Grahic Jump Location
Pixel mismatch and the difference in geometric transmission for observation position 1. (a) Variation of the axial position of the intermediate aperture in the geometry used for the simulation; (b) Variation of tilt angle of the concentrator axis downward from horizontal. Mismatch 1: pixels when the simulation is bright but the measurement is not. Mismatch 2: pixels where the measurement is bright but the simulation is not.
Grahic Jump Location
Total pixel mismatch before and after the optimization of the position for the intermediate aperture L1. The tilt angle of the concentrator axis has already been optimized.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In