0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Blade Design Trade-Offs Using Low-Lift Airfoils for Stall-Regulated HAWTs

[+] Author and Article Information
P. Giguère, M. S. Selig

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801

J. L. Tangler

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401

J. Sol. Energy Eng 121(4), 217-223 (Nov 01, 1999) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2888170 History: Received March 01, 1999; Revised November 01, 1999; Online February 14, 2008

Abstract

A systematic blade design study was conducted to explore the trade-offs in using low-lift airfoils for a 750-kilowatt stall-regulated wind turbine. Tip-region airfoils having a maximum-lift coefficient ranging from 0.7-1.2 were considered in this study, with the main objective of identifying the practical lower limit for the maximum-lift coefficient. Blades were optimized for both maximum annual energy production and minimum cost of energy using a method that takes into account aerodynamic and structural considerations. The results indicate that the effect of the maximum-lift coefficient on the cost of energy is small with a slight advantage to the highest maximum lift coefficient case considered in this study. As a consequence, higher maximum lift coefficient airfoils for the tip-region of the blade become more desirable as machine size increases, provided the airfoils yield acceptable stall characteristics. The conclusions are applicable to large wind turbines that use passive or active stall to regulate peak power.

Copyright © 1999 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In