0
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Review of Convective Loss Data From Solar Central Receivers

[+] Author and Article Information
R. F. Boehm

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

J. Sol. Energy Eng 109(2), 101-107 (May 01, 1987) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3268185 History: Received January 01, 1986; Online November 11, 2009

Abstract

A summary of previous experimental evaluations to determine convective losses from solar central receivers is given. In this review studies performed directly on actual central receivers or simulations that closely approximate central receiver geometries are considered. Because of the diversity of the previous studies, there are a number of classifications of the studies that can be made. From one perspective, two types of evaluations have been carried out: either those using performance data (often called efficiency tests), or those configuring the receiver so that losses can be more directly inferred (loss tests). In addition to classifying the experimental configurations according to geometry type (either external or cavity forms), it is also beneficial to distinguish between evaluations that take place when normal solar flux levels are incident upon the receiver (flux-on tests) and those made with no flux present (flux-off evaluations). Previous tests are categorized according to the method of testing used. Special attention is given to the range of the physical parameters represented by the experiments, particularly the Grashof number. Too often sufficient information to characterize forced convection contributions is not available, but it is shown that the total convective loss sometimes is lower than the predictions for natural convection alone. It is shown that performance-based data does not correspond well with loss-based data. The effects of directional effects of forced convection and general aspects of mixed (natural and forced) convection are not well established in the existing data. There have been some flux-on techniques recommended recently that may overcome some of the previously established concerns about the accuracy of flux-on data.

Copyright © 1987 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In